Route Choice Example
Read this page as a wrapper example for RHIP’s natural problem class. The larger simulation pages are where horizon recovery and cross-estimator evidence are reported.
The route-choice problem is the canonical setting for RHIP. A traveller moves through a road network one step at a time, choosing among the nearest neighbours of the current node. The utility of an edge depends on its length, the amenity of the destination, and how close the destination sits to a fixed goal node. This is a smoke example for the wrapper, not the simulation study.
import numpy as np
from econirl import RHIP
from econirl.environments import road_network
# Build a small 25-node road network.
env = road_network(num_nodes=25, num_actions=4, discount_factor=0.95, seed=0)
panel = env.simulate(n_agents=200, n_periods=30, seed=42)
# Features: (n_states, n_actions, 3) -- edge_cost, amenity, goal distance.
features = env.feature_matrix # shape (25, 4, 3)
transitions = env.transition_matrices # shape (4, 25, 25)
model = RHIP(
horizon=3,
discount=0.95,
scale=1.0,
feature_names=["edge_cost", "amenity", "goal"],
)
model.fit(panel, features=features, transitions=transitions)
print(model.params_)
print(model.predict_proba([0, 5, 12]))
Estimates depend on the chosen feature matrix, transition specification, and horizon, so no canonical output is shown here.
Interpretation
The three features capture the main trade-offs in route choice. edge_cost is
the negative Euclidean length of the edge, so a higher weight makes shorter
edges more attractive. amenity is a node-level draw, capturing desirability
of the destination. goal is the negative shortest-path distance to the
destination node, so a higher weight pulls the traveller toward the goal.
The fitted policy gives action probabilities at each node. Nodes near the goal
have high probability mass on the goal-approaching action. The horizon knob
controls how far ahead the agent plans: at horizon=0 the policy is the
softmax over a deterministic continuation value, at horizon=float("inf") it
is the full Max Causal Entropy solution.
Replication Boundary
This page is a package smoke test on a small synthetic network, not a full replication of the original study. The estimator’s recovery properties are established on larger synthetic panels where the data-generating process is fully specified. See the Simulation Study page. The high-dimensional route-choice study compares RHIP against the full estimator roster on a 150-node network.