UFXP
Unnested fixed point estimates the same structural parameters as NFXP without ever solving a dynamic program inside the parameter search. The value-function dependence of Bellman’s first-order conditions is eliminated by dual fixed points computed once, up front, so for a linear utility the whole estimator is a single closed-form solve. With its optimal weighting it is as asymptotically efficient as maximum likelihood.
Start here when you want structural estimates and standard errors at a small fraction of NFXP’s cost, or when the state space makes repeated Bellman solves painful.
Source Papers
This page draws on Bray for the unnested fixed-point construction and on Oguz and Bray (2026) for the optimally weighted form and its efficiency result.
Quick Decision
Use UFXP when |
Prefer another estimator when |
|---|---|
States and actions are discrete and transitions are known or pre-estimated. |
Transition estimation is the main modeling challenge. |
You want MLE-grade structural estimates much faster than NFXP. |
You need an exact finite-sample MLE benchmark (use NFXP). |
The likelihood search cost of NFXP or MPEC is binding. |
The reward must be high-dimensional or neural (use the IRL family). |
Most states are visited in the data. |
State coverage is very thin everywhere (CCP-style inversion degrades). |
Counterfactual policy analysis is central. |
You only need fitted choice probabilities. |
Quick Start
from econirl.datasets import load_rust_bus
from econirl import UFXP
df = load_rust_bus()
model = UFXP(n_states=90, discount=0.9999, utility="linear_cost")
model.fit(df, state="mileage_bin", action="replaced", id="bus_id")
print(model.params_)
print(model.summary())
Evidence
UFXP is reported on the low-dimensional action-dependent synthetic data-generating process. The simulation cell has known rewards, transitions, policies, values, Q functions, and Type A, Type B, and Type C counterfactual oracles. The machine-readable results file records the reported results. UFXP also runs on every page of the simulation studies alongside the rest of the structural family.
Evidence |
Current state |
|---|---|
Evidence scope |
Synthetic tabular simulation. |
Primary cell |
|
Machine-readable results file |
|
Counterfactual checks |
Type A, Type B, and Type C are reported in the results file. |
Public example |
Uses |